New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Webhook Authentication For WebRTC Play #6281
Conversation
hi @lastpeony , Thank you for the implementation. I read your comment and had a review of the PR. I'd like to discuss if there is an alternative way to make this implementation without breaking backward compatibility. Because the cost of breaking backward compatibility includes extra support and unhappy users, which may mean churn. Then my question is: What's the alternative implementation to not break backward compatibility? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Commented on the PR directly to find out the way without breaking backward compatibility
Hi @mekya Thank you for the review. |
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
Thank you @lastpeony |
#6211
With this form this PR breaks backward compatability of webhook publish authentication because there is a new app setting webhookPublishAuthEnabled and webhookPlayAuthEnabled
previously webhook auth was only for publish and webhook publish was enabled if webhook auth url is not empty.