Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ACNA- 1833 | Implementing external workflows #9

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

amulyakashyap09
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Implement reusable github workflows

Related Issue

ACNA-1833

Motivation and Context

Code Reusability
Avoiding Redundancy

How Has This Been Tested?

  • This will be tested after PR is merged and deployed.
  • This is workflow changes can only be tested post merge.

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • I have signed the Adobe Open Source CLA.
  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@MichaelGoberling
Copy link
Contributor

Same comments as the app plugin PR, recent runs of these jobs are failing. Should have them passing before we merge.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 5, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #9 (ba58d2c) into master (12f8487) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master        #9   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines          231       231           
  Branches        60        60           
=========================================
  Hits           231       231           

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

Copy link
Member

@purplecabbage purplecabbage left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is good, however, there might be benefit in actually publishing these shared workflows. This is something we should discuss

SLACK_MESSAGE: ${{ matrix.node-version }}
SLACK_COLOR: ${{ job.status == 'success' && 'good' || job.status == 'cancelled' && '#808080' || 'danger' }}

# if: github.repository == 'adobe/aio-cli-lib-app-config'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you should keep this line, otherwise these actions will run everyday on every fork ( and fail )

@purplecabbage
Copy link
Member

Also, have a look here: https://github.com/adobe/.github/tree/91ba8f2c7a4fe1178181a93b5c0186c285b43f1c/workflow-templates
Maybe we can store our workflows there instead of adobe/aio-reusable-workflows

@MichaelGoberling
Copy link
Contributor

@amulyakashyap09 Is this PR still needed? Seems external workflows were already added with #33

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants