Mark repo as host of software development

[dontcallmedom]

It looks like the repo is now more about the polyfill than spec development, so I'm suggesting to use repo-type: tool instead of cg-report

[marcoscaceres]

Thanks! I didn't know this ("repo-type": "tool") was a thing.

Other folks here, if this is becoming a tool, it might be time to move this out of the WICG - as it's there not going to be deliverables destined for a particular W3C or WHATWG working group? Or is the intent still to have this become part of HTML?

[marcoscaceres]

Oh, never mind, I think this is supposed to go into HTML https://whatpr.org/html/4288/interaction.html#the-inert-attribute

[marcoscaceres]

@alice, any chance of a quick summary of what's left for to be merged? whatwg/html#4288

The spec part of this incubation looks like it has more or less migrated HTML spec (which is fantastic!). Would you say there is much more incubation work to be done here?

cc @WICG/chairs

[alice]

Yes, it's meant to end up in HTML. Still waiting on that PR to be merged, which I think requires two shipped implementations?

[marcoscaceres]

Ok, cool - any interest from WebKit and Gecko folks? What about in terms of further incubation work? Would you say the design/architecture of this is done?

[alice]

The Mozilla Standards Position PR is still open: mozilla/standards-positions#371 - possibly pending resolution of whatwg/html#5650

WebKit indicated their intent on #69 (comment)

From my point of view the design/architecture is done, but it seems that there is not agreement on that end from Mozilla folks.

[marcoscaceres]

From my point of view the design/architecture is done, but it seems that there is not agreement on that end from Mozilla folks.

Thanks for the links! they were really helpful. Looks like Mozilla are going with "worth prototyping", which is a positive signal. Hoping you will come to a speedy resolution in whatwg/html#5650