Renamed IdentityRequestProvider to IdentityRequestDetails #71
Conversation
marcoscaceres
requested review from
samuelgoto,
RByers and
timcappalli
as code owners
| @@ -182,15 +182,15 @@ <h3> | |||
| provider=]. | |||
| </p> | |||
| <h2> | |||
| The `IdentityRequestProvider` dictionary | |||
| The `IdentityRequestDetails` dictionary | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we call this DigitalIdentityRequest as opposed to use the Details suffix? Details seems a bit off to me (although, surprisingly, there is a lot of "Details" in chrome, so maybe that's just me). Anyway, I think it is likely that whatever name you pick for this dictionary is likely to be temporary, because we need to form an opinion of what a providers is, so maybe we can just rename this when we figure out what to call providers?
[1] https://source.chromium.org/search?q=file:idl%20Details%20-file:out&sq=&ss=chromium
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yeah, that might be better indeed.
|
Blocked on #74 |
| @@ -182,15 +182,15 @@ <h3> | |||
| provider=]. | |||
| </p> | |||
| <h2> | |||
| The `IdentityRequestProvider` dictionary | |||
| The `IdentityRequestDetails` dictionary | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| The `IdentityRequestDetails` dictionary | |
| The `PresentationRequest` dictionary |
A request for a digital movie ticket is not a request for a digital identity... it's a request for the presentation of a digital credential.
Terminology that seems to have more consensus than "digital identity request" is the concept of a "presentation" (this is most likely across mDL, mDoc, VCs, AnonCreds, and other emerging digital credential formats).
Has this terminology been considered before?
https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-model/#dfn-presentation
Alternatives include:
- PresentationRequestDetails (adding the word "details" feels superfluous?)
- DigitalPresentationRequest (of course it's digital, redundant?)
Closes #70
Preview | Diff