Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IdentityRequestProvider should be renamed something like "options" or "details" #70

Open
marcoscaceres opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #71
Open

IdentityRequestProvider should be renamed something like "options" or "details" #70

marcoscaceres opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #71
Labels

Comments

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Collaborator

Although this is not "web observable" (because it's a dictionary), the IdentityRequestProvider is not exactly about "providers"... it's more about what the provider need to match on.

It might be good to rename the dictionary IdentityRequestOptions or IdentityRequestDetails or something...

@bc-pi
Copy link

bc-pi commented Feb 5, 2024

Concur that IdentityRequestOptions or IdentityRequestDetails would better convey the intent of this thing. I must admit I was somewhat confused reading the initial spec by the name of the thing "used to specify a request protocol and structured request" having the word "provider" in it, when Identity credential provider is seemingly the thing that answers such a request, not part of the request itself.

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Sent #71 ... going with "details" because some members are mandatory.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants