Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Output from fasta submission #32

Open
NicolasHipp opened this issue Jan 10, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Output from fasta submission #32

NicolasHipp opened this issue Jan 10, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@NicolasHipp
Copy link

NicolasHipp commented Jan 10, 2019

Hi everyone,

I tested bracer on my single cell rna seq data. I used two approaches:
-used both paired fastq from 1 cell
The problem with this approach is that bracer recognize multiple BCR_recombinants, so It do not perform all the downstream analyses.
When I looked for the TPM of these 2 BCR_recombinant, I have one major BCR and a minor BCR (I assumed that the major clone is the right one).

-used fasta file of BCR generated with BASIC aligner
Bracer give me the same clone as the major represented one in the first approach, but when I looked in the output, I don't have the clonotype_sizes.pdf and clonotype_sizes.txt output

Is-it normal if I don't have these both outputs?

I'm also running BALDR on this dataset to confirm that the major clone is the good one.

Ps : Happy new year, thanks for this soft

@idalind
Copy link
Collaborator

idalind commented Jan 13, 2019

Hi @NicolasHipp ,
Happy new year and thanks for the feedback! Did you run bracer summarise for just the one cell you tested, or for multiple cells?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants