[New Framework]: Oxygen.jl #8789
Conversation
| @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ | |||
| FROM julia:latest | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you tie this down to a specific version please
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@NateBrady23
How specific are we talking? Would setting it to version 1 be specific enough or are you looking for an exact 1.x.x version?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If their version convention is such that breaking changes can be introduced in 1.x, then 1.x.x would be best, but really it's so that you can reproduce results on other hardware from the exact versions used in any of our runs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
interactive pools in 1.9 and scheduling in 1.10 will give vastly different results.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Julia is super good about backward compatibility, so setting to the latest stable version 1 should be fine.
Any breaking changes would get placed in version 2 of the language
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's not a compatibility issue. But 1.10 does different scheduling which brings different performance. It's not good enough yet, but it's significantly better (mainly because you can avoid being blocked from precompilation)
Hi there, I'm the author of the Oxygen.jl framework and this is my first attempt at registering the framework, please let me know if anything needs to be changed before this can be merged