Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ravil/multi constrains #5

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ThrudPrimrose
Copy link

It is the same pulll request as before, I think it is better if we merge ravil's multi constraint branches. As I have extended that implementation.

new method generateGraph generates the dual graph representation of the mesh, a getter method to get the graph representation which can be used to compute edge weights, and the partition function now takes edgeweights as an additional input argument.

…of the mesh, allow partition() to take the vector fo edge weights as an additional argument
@krenzland
Copy link
Contributor

I don't see why we don't merge #3 first and then merge this directly into master?

@ThrudPrimrose
Copy link
Author

I think that will be better. (will be necessary for the seissol pull request too)

@krenzland krenzland changed the base branch from ravil/multi-constrains to master July 6, 2022 10:18
@krenzland
Copy link
Contributor

I did exactly that. This PR now points to master into which I've merged #3.

PartitionMetis.h Show resolved Hide resolved
PartitionMetis.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
PartitionMetis.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
PartitionMetis.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
PartitionMetis.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
thrudprimrose added 2 commits July 12, 2022 12:52
… adapt assertions and functions with the new names, and using tabs
@ThrudPrimrose
Copy link
Author

m is not used indeed, I had copied from the previous implementation. Now the identation is tabs, I have updated member variables (private) to use the prefix m_

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants