FAQ
name: This is not clear. Is this freeform or are there specific expectations?
This is meant to be freeform. The API has to be more widely appealing than just for, e.g., NOM Keur. It is not feasible to list all possible input here in an exhaustive list.
version: Version of what?
This describes the version of the listed supported norm. Norms have versions and different versions have different requirements and perhaps different nomenclature.
object_id of rel_data_objects: how unique does this have to be? Unique to the connection, to the system or...?
The monitoring service provider is free to choose this. At least it has to be unique to the connection, but it might be useful to have it be unique to the system. In that way, it should be easier for app developers to work with the API and keep their calls limited in scope and size.