Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP - support/testing for postgres 11 and 12 #59

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Dec 13, 2019

I did a quick spike thinking this would be easy 馃檮

The sticking point is that pg's 11 and 12 by default give ownership of pg_replication_origin and sql_languages to test_user. pgbedrock itself should be able to work against postgres 11 and 12 as-is, but updating the tests to have the correct initial state is a bit of a chore.

One idea is to add "except" support to ownership as well as schemas/tables - this would make the changes less verbose than trying to enumerate all the stuff in information_schema. For schemas/tables, we depend on the fact that we can scope tables under "read" and "write" which gives us a way to add "except" to the mix. We don't have this convenient "in" for ownership. We bounced around the idea of extending the DSL to allow a dict in addition to a string name / glob.

Unfortunately, I gotta drop this, but I wanted to push what I had to give anyone interested in this a starting point to jump from.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 13, 2019

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 206

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.1%) to 96.558%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 199: 0.1%
Covered Lines: 2553
Relevant Lines: 2644

馃挍 - Coveralls

@rodo
Copy link

rodo commented Aug 14, 2020

Hi, is there any chance to see this PR merged ? We are waiting for pg 11 support, and to be honest not confindent on a PR owned by a ghost ;-)
Thanks for all your work on this project

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants