Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Fix] Specify werkzeug version and modify readme(quick start) #390

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Kiminjo
Copy link

@Kiminjo Kiminjo commented Oct 4, 2023

This PR is a correction related to Issue #389.

Recently, the version of werkzeug has been updated, causing a problem that the code cannot execute.

The problem was solved by specifying the version of werkzeug in the Requirements.txt.

However, since I tested the modified code through python main.py, I also modified the Readme file. This should be changed back to the pip install format later.

Sanster added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2023
@Sanster
Copy link
Owner

Sanster commented Oct 5, 2023

Thank you so much!!! I set the werkzeug version in this commit: #390 and published a new version 1.2.4

aj-stein-nist added a commit to aj-stein-nist/scitt-api-emulator that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2023
In order to fix scitt-community#38, we need to hard
pin the version of Werkzeug used by Flask to avoid the changes after
to how functions are organized in the library's modules.

See PR Sanster/IOPaint#390 with a related solution (not specific to
Anaconda approach, but informative).

See [StackOverflow](https://stackoverflow.com/a/77217971) post for
details.
aj-stein-nist added a commit to aj-stein-nist/scitt-api-emulator that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2023
In order to fix scitt-community#38, we need to hard
pin the version of Werkzeug used by Flask to avoid the changes after
to how functions are organized in the library's modules.

See PR Sanster/IOPaint#390 with a related solution (not specific to
Anaconda approach, but informative).

See [StackOverflow](https://stackoverflow.com/a/77217971) post for
details.
pdxjohnny pushed a commit to pdxjohnny/scitt-api-emulator that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2023
In order to fix scitt-community#38, we need to hard
pin the version of Werkzeug used by Flask to avoid the changes after
to how functions are organized in the library's modules.

See PR Sanster/IOPaint#390 with a related solution (not specific to
Anaconda approach, but informative).

See [StackOverflow](https://stackoverflow.com/a/77217971) post for
details.
pdxjohnny pushed a commit to pdxjohnny/scitt-api-emulator that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2023
In order to fix scitt-community#38, we need to hard
pin the version of Werkzeug used by Flask to avoid the changes after
to how functions are organized in the library's modules.

See PR Sanster/IOPaint#390 with a related solution (not specific to
Anaconda approach, but informative).

See [StackOverflow](https://stackoverflow.com/a/77217971) post for
details.
SteveLasker pushed a commit to scitt-community/scitt-api-emulator that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2023
In order to fix #38, we need to hard
pin the version of Werkzeug used by Flask to avoid the changes after
to how functions are organized in the library's modules.

See PR Sanster/IOPaint#390 with a related solution (not specific to
Anaconda approach, but informative).

See [StackOverflow](https://stackoverflow.com/a/77217971) post for
details.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants