Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sequence to structure pairwise alignment parameter tuning #11

Open
nmih opened this issue Mar 14, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

Sequence to structure pairwise alignment parameter tuning #11

nmih opened this issue Mar 14, 2017 · 3 comments
Projects
Milestone

Comments

@nmih
Copy link
Member

nmih commented Mar 14, 2017

When running QC/QA, the first thing that is done is a pairwise alignment. The quality of this alignment can have a big impact of the result. The setting of gap score and gap extend penalties should be explored to prevent bad alignments -- example to be added later..

@nmih nmih added this to Unfiled TODO in v1.0 via automation Dec 11, 2017
@nmih nmih added this to the v1.0 milestone Dec 11, 2017
@nmih
Copy link
Member Author

nmih commented Jan 19, 2018

Example of how small quality parameters will impact selection of representative structure.
5AQ6 has 87.5% similarity for protein b1973 chain A but does not pass quality check while 1TXL with 87% SI does, due to small differences in the alignment.

1TXL on the left and 5AQ6 on the right
image

@erolkavvas
Copy link
Collaborator

wow this is fascinating... so each representative structure (5aq6, 1tx1, ... etc) is a different strain of E. Coli? It looks like 5aq6 is BL21, 5XM5 is K12, and 1tx1 is not specified.

@nmih
Copy link
Member Author

nmih commented Jan 19, 2018

Hah yeah actually I should have looked at that too. Thanks for checking it out Erol. Actually I made a typo, it's 1txl (which is K12) not 1tx1. But the strain check should be implemented as well..

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
v1.0
  
To do
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants