RBS #1054
Merged
RBS #1054
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
would you please ensure all files have standard unix line endings. happy to merge afterward |
|
I doubled checked all the files in the PR, they're all UTF-8 and end in LF, which is standard. Which files are giving you trouble? |
|
my fault for not getting back sooner. if you check the RBS files, github notes all of them are missing unix line endings. please, also resolve merge conflicts. happy to merge afterward. |
semmons99
approved these changes
Mar 18, 2024
|
ty! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds RBS files for the gem. It's something I needed for a project of mine, but I might as well offer the PR here too. I didn't change any of the files under lib (except for one spelling correction), and most of the types I was unsure about I left as
untyped.