Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[2.8] MOD-6178: [GeoPoly] Intersects Disjoint (#4227) #4251

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 2.8
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

raz-mon
Copy link
Collaborator

@raz-mon raz-mon commented Dec 21, 2023

Backport of #4227 to 2.8.

* initial commit

* some code repition

* finally managed to remove code duplication. unfortunately required a macro. still worth it

* formatting

* comment

* combining predicate and filter into unified predicate

* combining predicate and filter necessitates reversing the filter

* no macros

* no need to send query_geom to apply_predicate

* adding tests

* adding correction to point MBR to use the literal minimal possible bounding rectangle

* adding self-intersection/disjoint test

* adding hole to tests
@raz-mon raz-mon requested a review from oshadmi December 21, 2023 10:25
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 21, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (c4b6562) 83.23% compared to head (2d22f74) 83.30%.
Report is 63 commits behind head on 2.8.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              2.8    #4251      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.23%   83.30%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         192      192              
  Lines       33679    33715      +36     
==========================================
+ Hits        28032    28086      +54     
+ Misses       5647     5629      -18     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@raz-mon raz-mon added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 21, 2023
@raz-mon raz-mon removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Dec 21, 2023
Copy link

This pull request is stale because it has been open for 60 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Feb 20, 2024
@ccantill
Copy link

ccantill commented May 3, 2024

Is this still intended to be merged into 2.8, or when can we expect this to be available in a general release?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants