Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 6, 2021. It is now read-only.

Commit

Permalink
clarify: we do track for internal purposes
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
@sbalmer
sbalmer committed Jan 29, 2018
1 parent ea3c71f commit 0926a40
Showing 1 changed file with 3 additions and 3 deletions.
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions client/views/static/principles/principles.html
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ <h3> Education should be a collective participatory process</h3>
<h3>Digital platforms should respect the privacy of the users</h3>

<div>
The Openki platform allows for practically anonymous participation and does not
collect any form of private data except from the really minimum to allow for
reliable communication in the platform.
The Openki platform allows for practically anonymous participation. Usage is
tracked for internal purposes to allow detecting abuse, register client-side
errors, and improvement of the service.

As mentioned above, this means that the necessary trust needs to be created
outside the platform. For this, the platform does not take any responsibility
Expand Down

3 comments on commit 0926a40

@sablonier
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a thought because of recent discussion elsewhere: Isn't it possible to say what exactly is collected, what is the 'really minimum' mentioned (i.e. full IPs?, geolocation data?, browser/software?), where it is stored exactly and how long it is kept there?

@sbalmer
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sbalmer sbalmer commented on 0926a40 Feb 2, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have to figure out these things for ourselves too. And asking these questions might actually improve our handling of sensitive data. And lead to speedy deletion for sensitive stuff. So in general I think it's a good idea.

Regarding this commit I think it would be better to just get something out rather than waiting until we have it settled for ourselves.

@1u
Copy link
Member

@1u 1u commented on 0926a40 Feb 5, 2018 •
edited

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Apropos Principles:
We are anyways working on the values and vision texts. I'm asking my self about the potential connection and potential redundancy.
@lu40 what do you think?

Please sign in to comment.