Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed a bug: connections weren't actually removed #79

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

CPEGaebler
Copy link

In server_interface::MessageClient(client):
In the branch where "client" was found to be not connected (else on line 918): Line 926, "client.reset()," is before line 929, "erase client from m_deqConnections." This means "client" evaluates to nullptr, whereas the shared_ptr in m_deqConnections has not been reset. Nothing is removed from the container.

Fix: I swapped the two lines.

Found by / reproducable by:
My implementation had a function "DisconnectClient" which copied the logic in this else block. Another function, "DisconnectAll," simply said:
while (!m_deqConnections.empty()) DisconnectClient(m_deqConnections.front()); Infinite loop.

I don't know why the file viewer says I changed the Author line. I didn't.

In server_interface::MessageClient(client):
In the branch where "client" was found to be not connected (else on line 918):
Line 926, "client.reset()," is before line 929, "erase client from m_deqConnections."
This means "client" evaluates to nullptr, whereas the shared_ptr in m_deqConnections has not been reset.
Nothing is removed from the container.

Fix:  I swapped the two lines.

Found by / reproducable by:
My implementation had a function "DisconnectClient" which copied the logic in this else block.
Another function, "DisconnectAll," simply said:
while (!m_deqConnections.empty()) DisconnectClient(m_deqConnections.front());
Infinite loop.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant