Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate IEEE 1873-2015 format #677

Open
jlblancoc opened this issue Mar 5, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

Investigate IEEE 1873-2015 format #677

jlblancoc opened this issue Mar 5, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@jlblancoc
Copy link
Member

1873-2015 - IEEE Standard for Robot Map Data Representation for Navigation.

To do: Investigate if it might be legal to provide an open-source implementation of this pay-per-read standard...

@jolting
Copy link
Member

jolting commented Mar 5, 2018

I'm not a lawyer, but I believe it's fine as long as you don't post the PDF.
At least in the US Copyright law isn't usually the issue with this stuff. Patent law is and I doubt the standard is encumbered by patents.

At least two of XML map data samples in that doc are actually GPL or LGPL licensed, so you can use that at least.

@jlblancoc
Copy link
Member Author

@jlblancoc
Copy link
Member Author

jlblancoc commented Oct 30, 2018

I had access to the IEEE norm via our institutional Library. This task is doable, will do it someday... It's only a pity they chose XML as the underlying format instead of YAML or alike...

Funny fact: the introduction of the IEEE standard explicitly motivates the need for it because OpenSLAM, MRPT, ROS and ORCA all define maps but they are not compatible with each other.

This is in the spirit of #846 , btw...

@bergercookie
Copy link
Contributor

Looks interesting! haven't read the paper but all in all sounds like a good initiative.

@jlblancoc jlblancoc added this to the Release v2.2.0 milestone Feb 15, 2021
@jlblancoc jlblancoc removed this from the Release v2.2.0 milestone Apr 15, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants