You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The AB/AABB, AAB and AAAB subset have one major peak each and they end up being estimated to be
30.4 2236.5
20.2 1431.4
14.6 3077.4
The 20.2 is simply a messup, but 30.4 and 14.6 are a mistake by denominator - AB is dividing by the coverage AABB smudge (thinking it's AB) which leads to doubling of the AB/AABB coverage estimate; 14.6 is close to truth because the first peak indeed is the AAAB.
Weight mean ends with an estimate in between of two possible interpretations ~20. Which is a bit unfortunate, perhaps a weighted median would do a better justice. But this should be tested with many many genomes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
About your genome
The tetraploid Sacharomyces (SRR3265401)
The AB/AABB, AAB and AAAB subset have one major peak each and they end up being estimated to be
The 20.2 is simply a messup, but 30.4 and 14.6 are a mistake by denominator - AB is dividing by the coverage AABB smudge (thinking it's AB) which leads to doubling of the AB/AABB coverage estimate; 14.6 is close to truth because the first peak indeed is the AAAB.
Weight mean ends with an estimate in between of two possible interpretations ~20. Which is a bit unfortunate, perhaps a weighted median would do a better justice. But this should be tested with many many genomes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: