[sdl] update to SDL3 #9387
[sdl] update to SDL3 #9387
Conversation
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
|
Hi @akallabeth, thanks a lot for your work on this feature, is this port still on going as of right now ? It seems you are most likely busy working on other features at the moment ? Is there any way someone that has no prior knowledge in this codebase help move this forward ? I have little experience with CMake (more with CMake than with C++) I've seen this : https://github.com/libsdl-org/SDL/blob/main/docs/README-migration.md that might be helpful |
|
@AkechiShiro well, waiting for |
|
@akallabeth A prerelease was done for SDL3 recently was done : https://github.com/libsdl-org/SDL/releases/tag/prerelease-3.1.0 Just thought you might want to get this news ! |
akallabeth
force-pushed
the
sdl3
branch
2 times, most recently
from
5c3ce4e
to
616f2e0
Compare
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
|
Any progress so far, I've seen new preview release for SDL3, thanks also for working on this ! |
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
|
Can this be used yet or tested in any way? Just would like to know if users could beta test and report issues on SDL3's preview version for |
yes.
|
|
@LDprg @oskardotglobal any of you could do some testing with winapps with this experimental SDL3 backend ? If you cannot, I'll see if I can take some time to do so and report back my findings here so we can squash bugs in advance. |
|
@hardening @mfleisz @bmiklautz @pnowack I´d appreciate a review (does not have to be thorough) of this pr. this way we can get (at least some) feedback from interested parties. |
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
|
@freerdp-bot test again please... |
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
* Copy SDL2 client to SDL3 as the new version is not API compatible * Move existing SDL2 client to SDL2 directory * Move fonts from SDL client to resources folder in top level directory
update client for SDL3. Not compatible with SDL2
Allow SDL2 and SDL3 client to be installed side by side as well as an option to only install one and name it accordingly
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
sdl3,sdl3_imageandsdl3_ttfSDL2andSDL3client installable side by side or replacing each other (configurable)OFFforSDL3client build