Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create copyright.md #32

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Create copyright.md #32

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

yorikvanhavre
Copy link
Member

Stub: How and when to hand copyright over to the FPA


1. **Give the FPA full control over the destiny of that file**

The FPA and its administrators will then be able to do things like change the file's license without the author's consentment. It should be noted that this action concentrates copyright in the hands of a single body, which is not something advisable in a community-developed project. The FreeCAD code being in many hands is actually beneficial for the software, as it prevents a single actor from gaining too much power over the code. As protecting the community nature of FreeCAD is part of the statutes of the FPA, contributors are encouraged to not hand over their contributions to the FPA without a good reason. Their individual hold over part of the FreeCAD code's copyright is a strength to FreeCAD.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think the discussion of copyright concentration belongs here. It feels like it needs the wikipedia *citation needed. There are a lot of schools of thought on that topic and I don't think we want to pick one.

I would rather there be a simple explanation of what it means to assign copyright. What is the creator giving up.
Related to that, It's appropriate to touch on why someone might want to assign copyright so I would leave that part alone.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure... I think this should inform users of what they are doing. They will likely not go see elsewhere. However you have a point, this is a single point of view. What about adding more, like reasons why you WOULD want to hand you r copyright over

Copyright (c) 2004 The FreeCAD project association <fpa@freecad.org>
```

If you are John Doe, or
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This example is confusing. Was it meant to illustrate a joint copyright being amended to remove one person?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Basically you don't remove other person's copyrights. You can just add your own

@chennes
Copy link
Member

chennes commented Jan 13, 2024

Is this still alive, @yorikvanhavre? Or can we close it?

@yorikvanhavre
Copy link
Member Author

I would keep it alive. We still didn't solve the question and I think we should. Let me try to rephrase.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants