Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Navigation with Updates #10

Open
Enegnei opened this issue Aug 2, 2016 · 20 comments
Open

Navigation with Updates #10

Enegnei opened this issue Aug 2, 2016 · 20 comments
Labels
enhancement for correcting formatting bugs or improving organisation and presentation of the information

Comments

@Enegnei
Copy link
Owner

Enegnei commented Aug 2, 2016

I've opened this issue to ask how easy it is for you (readers) to find new information in my investigation. Even though every commit is highlighted in the History, I don't know whether readers use that to find new information or if you just scroll through the article looking for parts that seem new. I would appreciate if I could get a few responses on one or more of these questions:

1) How do you find new information/ updates that I add? How easy are they to find?
2) Do you think I should make it easier to find these new/ updated sections?

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 2, 2016

Since it's Git, just use the Git history. Why fight it? To help people who aren't familiar with Git, you could put a link inside the text along with instructions and an explanation of what people will be seeing there.

It's not an ideal answer from a UX standpoint, but anything else will involve endless curation.

@Enegnei
Copy link
Owner Author

Enegnei commented Aug 2, 2016

I've been thinking of maybe having a small section at the top of the page which lists the latest updates of that week, linking to sub-headers if it's several paragraphs or a new section, such as:

Latest updates: Tor Project concludes investigation, "Sam" story, Tor shares company policies

From there they can just do a keyword search if there isn't a sub-header link. But yeah I agree using History is the preferred option, that's what I would do. I just want to know if readers are doing the same.

@ralphtheninja
Copy link

@Enegnei Many open source projects have some sort of CHANGELOG document which is used to highlight things that changed but on a higher level, instead of going into details. So it could say "Added section blabla, removed thisandthat" etc.

@shannoncunningham
Copy link

shannoncunningham commented Aug 3, 2016

I've been using the History tab, but it def. is more of a pain than
Wikipedia…

I've been thinking of maybe having a small section at the top of the
page which lists the latest updates of that week, linking to
sub-headers if it's several paragraphs or a new section, such as:

LATEST UPDATES: Tor Project concludes investigation, "Sam" story,
Tor shares company policies

Something like this would be great, if it isn't much trouble to do… I
just appreciate that the resource exists at all, so I certainly can't
complain. :)

@Enegnei
Copy link
Owner Author

Enegnei commented Aug 3, 2016

@shannoncunningham Thanks for the input! It wouldn't be much trouble at all to do.

@Enegnei
Copy link
Owner Author

Enegnei commented Aug 4, 2016

I've now added a "Latest updates" section at the top of the page under the table of contents: https://github.com/Enegnei/JacobAppelbaumLeavesTor/blob/master/JacobAppelbaumLeavesTor.md#latest-updates. It links to the header or subheader closest to where the change was.

@jeroenh
Copy link

jeroenh commented Aug 4, 2016

First of all, I subscribed to the issues, but now see that you've done a lot more than is seen here.

Second, thanks for the latest updates addition! Unfortunately the links don't work, at least not on iOS.

@Enegnei
Copy link
Owner Author

Enegnei commented Aug 4, 2016

@jeroenh Oh, that's unfortunate. I haven't used GitHub on Mac or iOS so I wouldn't have caught that. So the shortcut links I have in the table of contents also don't work on iOS?

@jeroenh
Copy link

jeroenh commented Aug 5, 2016

@J9Roem that's correct, they don't work. They just link to the top of the file.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 5, 2016

The links work OK on my Mac with OS X 10.10.5. Perhaps it is just an iOS problem.

@Enegnei
Copy link
Owner Author

Enegnei commented Aug 5, 2016

@jeroenh Does iOS normally work with internal shortcut links? For example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GitHub#Gist

@jeroenh
Copy link

jeroenh commented Aug 6, 2016

@J9Roem that Wikipedia link does work. So it seems to be something with the way the targets are defined.

@Enegnei
Copy link
Owner Author

Enegnei commented Aug 7, 2016

@jeroenh Hmm, okay. No way for me to fix that, would have to be done on the iOS-end. This may be a use case for creating a webpage with GitHub Pages.

@Enegnei Enegnei closed this as completed Aug 9, 2016
@Enegnei Enegnei reopened this Aug 9, 2016
@Enegnei
Copy link
Owner Author

Enegnei commented Aug 9, 2016

I am thinking about trying something out as an experiment for https://twitter.com/J9Roem/status/756486124290318337 which may also help with navigation (including the iOS link issue, cc: @jeroenh). I've been prompted by my partner to publish a nicer copy of this investigation outside of GitHub and https://www.gitbook.com seems to be a display platform for Git/ GitHub writers. I wouldn't use it to solely write on, as there doesn't appear to be any support for viewing tracked changes or downloading/ cloning the repository on the reader side (I haven't made an account but it sounds like there is that option for the writer/ user - I hope so, otherwise what then is the point of version control?!). Since the whole reason I'm doing it this way is to have transparent editing, that would really defeat the purpose.

The upside is that it looks just a bit friendlier (I like their offering of white/ sepia/ night modes) and would be an option for people who just want a blog or eBook-type page. I could also add a more formal bibliography with its own page (cc: @jdormansteele). Obviously this GitHub repo would still be my main page for this investigation but I might consider recreating it there for navigation and aesthetic reasons. My real goal is to host all this on IPFS eventually and if the GitBook format appeals to people I may draw from it.

This was referenced Sep 18, 2016
@elvey
Copy link

elvey commented Oct 5, 2016

FYI: The http://vimple.co/04506a053f124483b8fb05ed73899f19 link (North Korea video) has gone dead. I wonder why. (Possibly falsified) DMCA claim, I guess. Can you let us know and put it up somewhere?

And it's hard to say that's Jake in the photo taken in North Korea. If it had been working, I'd never have followed the link to this fascinating page: https://archive.is/OIK0V (which is an archive of an 0bin.net post that has also gone away)!

And I found http://archive.is/Qmr32 , which shows that https://blog.torproject.org/blog/what-tor-supporter-looks-%E2%80%93-jacob-appelbaum , which is currently online, was indeed taken offline for a time, as you claim. Suggest adding it. I suppose I could submit a patch...

Just saw the two English Zeit articles. Glad to see more evidence that this person I've long seen as a powerful force for good is far, far less flawed than he's been painted. For a time, I seriously doubted he is a force for good. I wonder how many within the orgs that have kicked him to the curb are regretting their decisions.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 5, 2016

I have a copy of the NK video somewhere. I'll post it and let Janine know.

-- David

@Enegnei
Copy link
Owner Author

Enegnei commented Oct 5, 2016

@elvey & @jdormansteele - In this case it wasn't a DMCA claim, Vimple lets you host videos through their site as long as it gets more than 10 views in a period of 90 days, so I guess there weren't enough people clicking on it. I still have a local copy of the entire video, so no worries there. If anyone wants to host it or is already hosting it, just let me know.

@elvey - I wouldn't have found the article if I hadn't seen the NK tourism video first (since neither Yi nor the video mention the other tourists by name), but they definitely match as all the people in the picture are also in the video.

Thanks for that archive link on the vanished blog post, I will add it.

Enegnei added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 5, 2016
Replaced live link with archive of vanished blog post, from here: #10 (comment)

I also changed "deleted" to "unpublished," as whoever removed it probably made it private rather than deleting it.
Enegnei added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 7, 2016
The North Korea tourism video didn't receive enough views to still receive free hosting (it needed to get at least 10 views in 90 days), so Vimple has now taken it down. Please let me know if you want to host it or it is already being hosted elsewhere. #10 (comment)
Enegnei added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 2, 2017
@dmytri
Copy link

dmytri commented May 21, 2017

Do you mind listing Franziska as a simply member of Telekommunisten, and not as my wife, that seems to diminish her position and is not relevant, the letter was from Telekommunisten and was signed by three people, leave it at that.

@Enegnei
Copy link
Owner Author

Enegnei commented May 22, 2017

@dmytri No problem. I always provide linked attribution for whoever contributed to articles, statements, quotes, etc. whenever possible, and that was simply the first outside reference I found. No disrespect intended. Let me know if anything else is inaccurate.

@Enegnei Enegnei added the enhancement for correcting formatting bugs or improving organisation and presentation of the information label Mar 7, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement for correcting formatting bugs or improving organisation and presentation of the information
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants