Fix issues with visibility change #28857
Open
+559
−407
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* Add explicit common types * supress
…into typespec-next
…pi-specs into typespec-next
…into typespec-next
…into typespec-next
Next Steps to Merge✅ All automated merging requirements have been met! To get your PR merged, see aka.ms/azsdk/specreview/merge. |
Swagger Validation Report
|
| Rule | Message |
|---|---|
| "How to fix":"Check the detailed log and verify if the TypeSpec emitter is able to create API review file for the changes in PR." | |
| "How to fix":"Check the detailed log and verify if the TypeSpec emitter is able to create API review file for the changes in PR." | |
| "How to fix":"Check the detailed log and verify if the TypeSpec emitter is able to create API review file for the changes in PR." | |
| "How to fix":"Check the detailed log and verify if the TypeSpec emitter is able to create API review file for the changes in PR." |
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Summary.
️️✔️Automated merging requirements met succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
|
PR validation pipeline started successfully. If there is ApiView generated, it will be updated in this comment. |
timotheeguerin
approved these changes
Apr 26, 2024
markcowl
requested review from
weshaggard,
mikeharder,
konrad-jamrozik,
benbp,
NonStatic2014 and
Kishp01
as code owners
markcowl
requested review from
palma21,
matthchr,
yangyuan,
wiboris,
dpwatrous,
skapur12,
cRui861,
wanghoppe,
hmlam,
lmazuel,
deyaaeldeen,
JoshLove-msft,
swathipil,
conniey,
minhanh-phan and
a team
as code owners
markcowl
requested review from
tg-msft and
marclerwick
and removed request for
a team
|
@markcowl: Probably want to close this? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Choose a PR Template
Switch to "Preview" on this description then select one of the choices below.
Click here to open a PR for a Data Plane API.
Click here to open a PR for a Control Plane (ARM) API.