Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Clarify comment in backup consumer logic #781

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

aiven-anton
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Comment on lines +303 to +306
# produced we need to subtract 1. Note that this has little to do with high
# watermark, which takes into account the highest record offset to be fully
# in sync across ISRs, and therefore can be an arbitrary number less than
# or equal to the LEO.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

great, thanks for the explaination! This save a lot of time to the reader of the code. Can we mention also what happens if the topic its empty?

@@ -298,7 +298,13 @@ def _consume_records(
if start_offset >= end_offset:
raise EmptyPartition

end_offset -= 1 # high watermark to actual end offset
# kafka-python returns end offset + 1, i.e. the value that will be assigned
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

kafka-python -> confluent-kafka-python now :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants