feat: implement fastify server

[Romakita]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

Benchmarks

• Machine: linux x64 | 4 vCPUs | 15.6GB Mem
• Node: v18.19.0
• Run: Sat Feb 03 2024 08:48:57 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
• Method: autocannon -c 100 -d 10 -p 10 localhost:3000 (two rounds; one to warm-up, one to measure)

	Version	Router	Requests/s	Latency	Throughput/Mb
fastify	3.29.4	✓	42422.4	23.06	7.57
nest-fastify	8.4.3	✓	39520.0	24.81	7.05
koa	2.13.4	✗	34252.4	28.70	6.11
fastify-injector	3.29.4	✓	29482.9	33.39	6.72
express	4.18.1	✓	10838.2	91.51	1.93
fastify-big-json	3.29.4	✓	9859.0	100.45	113.41
nest	8.4.3	✓	9820.0	100.82	2.36
express-injector	4.18.1	✗	9342.4	106.14	2.13
express-morgan	4.18.1	✗	6972.4	142.13	1.24
tsed-express	7.61.0	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
tsed-koa	7.61.0	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A

Explanation

The benchmark shows a performance difference between the frameworks. We note that Ts.ED is often last. In fact, Ts.ED uses features useful to a production application which reduce its performance.

For example, Ts.ED initializes a sandbox (async_hook) for each request in order to work in an isolated context if necessary.
It also initializes the elements necessary for monitoring requests in a log manager.

All this at a necessary cost that reflects the reality of a production application ;)

[github-actions]

Benchmarks

• Machine: linux x64 | 4 vCPUs | 15.6GB Mem
• Node: v18.19.1
• Run: Sun Mar 24 2024 09:27:42 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
• Method: autocannon -c 100 -d 10 -p 10 localhost:3000 (two rounds; one to warm-up, one to measure)

	Version	Router	Requests/s	Latency	Throughput/Mb
koa	2.13.4	✗	34043.6	28.86	6.07
tsed-koa	7.67.0	✓	11684.0	84.82	9.89
express	4.18.1	✓	10255.6	96.66	1.83
nest	8.4.3	✓	9838.2	100.77	2.36
express-injector	4.18.1	✗	9655.8	102.43	2.20
tsed-express	7.67.0	✓	8685.0	114.11	1.59
express-morgan	4.18.1	✗	5713.6	173.18	1.02
fastify-big-json	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
fastify-injector	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
fastify	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
nest-fastify	8.4.3	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A

Explanation

The benchmark shows a performance difference between the frameworks. We note that Ts.ED is often last. In fact, Ts.ED uses features useful to a production application which reduce its performance.

For example, Ts.ED initializes a sandbox (async_hook) for each request in order to work in an isolated context if necessary.
It also initializes the elements necessary for monitoring requests in a log manager.

All this at a necessary cost that reflects the reality of a production application ;)

[github-actions]

Benchmarks

• Machine: linux x64 | 4 vCPUs | 15.6GB Mem
• Node: v18.19.1
• Run: Sun Mar 24 2024 09:46:01 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
• Method: autocannon -c 100 -d 10 -p 10 localhost:3000 (two rounds; one to warm-up, one to measure)

	Version	Router	Requests/s	Latency	Throughput/Mb
koa	2.13.4	✗	34194.4	28.73	6.10
tsed-koa	7.67.0	✓	11982.9	82.68	10.15
express	4.18.1	✓	10485.5	94.36	1.87
nest	8.4.3	✓	9939.8	99.81	2.39
express-injector	4.18.1	✗	9195.8	107.61	2.10
tsed-express	7.67.0	✓	8751.6	113.06	1.60
express-morgan	4.18.1	✗	5635.6	175.60	1.00
fastify-big-json	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
fastify-injector	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
fastify	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
nest-fastify	8.4.3	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A

Explanation

The benchmark shows a performance difference between the frameworks. We note that Ts.ED is often last. In fact, Ts.ED uses features useful to a production application which reduce its performance.

For example, Ts.ED initializes a sandbox (async_hook) for each request in order to work in an isolated context if necessary.
It also initializes the elements necessary for monitoring requests in a log manager.

All this at a necessary cost that reflects the reality of a production application ;)

[github-actions]

Benchmarks

• Machine: linux x64 | 4 vCPUs | 15.6GB Mem
• Node: v18.19.1
• Run: Sun Mar 24 2024 10:18:36 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
• Method: autocannon -c 100 -d 10 -p 10 localhost:3000 (two rounds; one to warm-up, one to measure)

	Version	Router	Requests/s	Latency	Throughput/Mb
koa	2.13.4	✗	34670.6	28.33	6.18
tsed-koa	7.67.0	✓	12099.3	81.88	10.25
express	4.18.1	✓	10520.4	94.27	1.88
nest	8.4.3	✓	10449.1	94.85	2.51
express-injector	4.18.1	✗	9516.2	104.14	2.17
tsed-express	7.67.0	✓	8903.0	111.29	1.63
express-morgan	4.18.1	✗	5732.8	172.50	1.02
fastify-big-json	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
fastify-injector	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
fastify	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
nest-fastify	8.4.3	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A

Explanation

The benchmark shows a performance difference between the frameworks. We note that Ts.ED is often last. In fact, Ts.ED uses features useful to a production application which reduce its performance.

For example, Ts.ED initializes a sandbox (async_hook) for each request in order to work in an isolated context if necessary.
It also initializes the elements necessary for monitoring requests in a log manager.

All this at a necessary cost that reflects the reality of a production application ;)