Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JUnit5 migration in msa. #10686

Merged
merged 4 commits into from May 13, 2024
Merged

JUnit5 migration in msa. #10686

merged 4 commits into from May 13, 2024

Conversation

zzzeebra
Copy link
Contributor

@zzzeebra zzzeebra commented Apr 30, 2024

Pull Request description

JUnit5 migration in msa.

General checklist

  • You have reviewed the guidelines document.
  • Labels that classify your pull request have been added.
  • The milestone is specified and corresponds to fix version.
  • Description references specific issue.
  • Description contains human-readable scope of changes.
  • Description contains brief notes about what needs to be added to the documentation.
  • No merge conflicts, commented blocks of code, code formatting issues.
  • Changes are backward compatible or upgrade script is provided.
  • Similar PR is opened for PE version to simplify merge. Crosslinks between PRs added. Required for internal contributors only.

Front-End feature checklist

  • Screenshots with affected component(s) are added. The best option is to provide 2 screens: before and after changes;
  • If you change the widget or other API, ensure it is backward-compatible or upgrade script is present.
  • Ensure new API is documented here

Back-End feature checklist

  • Added corresponding unit and/or integration test(s). Provide written explanation in the PR description if you have failed to add tests.
  • If new dependency was added: the dependency tree is checked for conflicts.
  • If new service was added: the service is marked with corresponding @TbCoreComponent, @TbRuleEngineComponent, @TbTransportComponent, etc.
  • If new REST API was added: the RestClient.java was updated, issue for Python REST client is created.
  • If new yml property was added: make sure a description is added (above or near the property).

Signed-off-by: Oleksandra Matviienko <al.zzzeebra@gmail.com>
@ashvayka
Copy link
Member

ashvayka commented May 6, 2024

There is a compilation error.

@ashvayka ashvayka added the Ignore for release Ignore this PR for release notes label May 6, 2024
@ashvayka ashvayka added this to the 3.7 milestone May 6, 2024
… compilation.

Signed-off-by: Oleksandra Matviienko <al.zzzeebra@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@smatvienko-tb smatvienko-tb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
To workaround the testcontainers startup without JUnit4 there is the best way choosen:
'''

software.xdev
testcontainers-junit4-mock
test

'''

@ashvayka ashvayka merged commit 1f5ef42 into thingsboard:master May 13, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Ignore for release Ignore this PR for release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants