Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ENH: Parallel specification of next API #999

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

effigies
Copy link
Collaborator

@effigies effigies commented May 2, 2023

Trying out some Protocols to start on #989 and get some feedback.

The goal is to shift this into bids, but for right now it's easier to use a separate package.

Some initial notes:

  1. Trying out putting get() back, but ensuring it only ever returns files.
  2. I'm using Dataset instead of Layout. I think that will help make a cleaner mental break, and could allow us to have both implementations in parallel for a while.
  3. We probably want to come up with different names for the protocols than the concrete classes. Will need to think about this. Open to suggestions.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 2, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (22d2eb5) 83.42% compared to head (bcddeb1) 83.42%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #999   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.42%   83.42%           
=======================================
  Files          38       38           
  Lines        4290     4290           
  Branches     1100     1100           
=======================================
  Hits         3579     3579           
  Misses        515      515           
  Partials      196      196           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant