Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Textureless poor performance compared with SuperGlue #269

Open
YJonmo opened this issue May 8, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Textureless poor performance compared with SuperGlue #269

YJonmo opened this issue May 8, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@YJonmo
Copy link

YJonmo commented May 8, 2023

Hi there,

I tried the outdoor trained model with a sample outdoor image and it performs poorly (so many mistakes). I tried with SuperGlue and provided fewer matched points but a lot more accurate. Here are the results:

LoFTR:
image

SuperGlue
image

How can I improve the results? do you recommend training the models on my data?
@YJonmo YJonmo changed the title Textrureless poor performance compared with SuperGlue Textureless poor performance compared with SuperGlue May 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@YJonmo