Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use other method instead dense_flow #273

Open
dagongji10 opened this issue Oct 9, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Use other method instead dense_flow #273

dagongji10 opened this issue Oct 9, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@dagongji10
Copy link

dagongji10 commented Oct 9, 2019

I hope to use PWC-Net extract optflow because dense-flow is too slow. But when I use PWC-Net optflow to train model, the acc is below 70%. And I also try farneback(t=0) instead tvl1(t=1) when use dense-flow to extract optflow, but model acc is only 75%.
The train process followed README file. Is there any train tips can improve acc?

@Fovever1
Copy link

i meet same problem,when i use other way to extract frame, for example,ffmpeg, model acc doesn't get the paper result, it seems like it has the relationship with frame format or flow format,maybe the format is not same as paper,i think it leads this problem.

@Fovever1
Copy link

@dagongji10 Do you find the cause?

@dagongji10
Copy link
Author

@dagongji10 Do you find the cause?

Maybe you need to modify parameter:num_segments. The default value is 3 but best value in paper is 7. In fact, we only need to train flow mode because rgb mode with same input(rgb frame) while optical flow may have great difference. I tried to train flow mode with farneback flow but the results were not as good as the article suggested. Maybe tvl1 is best for TSN.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants