You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that the Flatpak is mentioned in the README, but Unciv isn't verified on Flathub. Would you consider verifying it to let people know it's an official package? Here's a link to the documentation on how to verify on Flathub https://docs.flathub.org/docs/for-app-authors/verification.
Related Issue Links
No response
Desired Solution
You could verify the flatpak by putting the verification token on the website.
Alternative Approaches
You could also verify the flatpak through the GitHub repo.
Additional Context
Verifying lets people know that the package is officially created by, or officially endorsed by, the original project. This makes people more confident in getting the package from Flathub.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Before creating
Problem Description
I noticed that the Flatpak is mentioned in the README, but Unciv isn't verified on Flathub. Would you consider verifying it to let people know it's an official package? Here's a link to the documentation on how to verify on Flathub https://docs.flathub.org/docs/for-app-authors/verification.
Related Issue Links
No response
Desired Solution
You could verify the flatpak by putting the verification token on the website.
Alternative Approaches
You could also verify the flatpak through the GitHub repo.
Additional Context
Verifying lets people know that the package is officially created by, or officially endorsed by, the original project. This makes people more confident in getting the package from Flathub.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: