We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Thanks to xspec, it is already possible to obtain detailed coverage reports for xsl when the -c option is included during command line execution.
-c
It might be interesting if one of the reports is 'understood' by SonarQube . Sonar could then do a statistical analysis of the xsl in a project.
Sonar provides generic formats for test coverage .
There are many ways to add this functionality.
Under @cmarchand's help, I worked on this idea.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Thanks to xspec, it is already possible to obtain detailed coverage reports for xsl
when the
-c
option is included during command line execution.It might be interesting if one of the reports is 'understood' by SonarQube .
Sonar could then do a statistical analysis of the xsl in a project.
Sonar provides generic formats for test coverage .
There are many ways to add this functionality.
Under @cmarchand's help, I worked on this idea.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: