Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why the result is not statisfactory as like the result in paper? #138

Open
1AnXu opened this issue Nov 17, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Why the result is not statisfactory as like the result in paper? #138

1AnXu opened this issue Nov 17, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@1AnXu
Copy link

1AnXu commented Nov 17, 2023

Hello, I used the model provided by this reposity to test datasets, such as set5, set14, BSD100 and so on. However, the result is not goot as described in your paper, which is only 28.5478/0.8150 | 24.7989/0.6689 | 23.9438/0.6221. Can you tell me why? Is there any body who can help me?

@d-linlin
Copy link

Hello, I used the model provided by this reposity to test datasets, such as set5, set14, BSD100 and so on. However, the result is not goot as described in your paper, which is only 28.5478/0.8150 | 24.7989/0.6689 | 23.9438/0.6221. Can you tell me why? Is there any body who can help me?

May I ask how you calculated PSNR?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants