New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Include conditions in proxying functionality #2695
Comments
I don't think this is something we'd want to do in the core library, but you could implement this fairly trivially by building a |
Thanks for your response. Sorry, but I don't quite understand how to cover the need with what you indicate. I have followed the following link ( https://wiremock.org/docs/extensibility/transforming-responses/) and I don't understand how to cover the examples I have specified. Thanks |
I suggest you head over to the Slack community if you need some support creating and installing WireMock extensions. |
No, webhooks is built into the core now, so there's no extension in more recent versions |
Proposal
Hello,
I am testing Wiremock's proxying functionality to “route” certain http requests that arrive to my Wiremock pod to a URL. Everything works correctly using the following configuration file: {
Would it be possible to establish conditions for the proxying functionality? Some examples:
I would appreciate it if you considered implementing this type of improvement in future versions.
Thanks in advance
References
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: