Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modify the publication type #215

Open
rejanef opened this issue Jan 31, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Modify the publication type #215

rejanef opened this issue Jan 31, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@rejanef
Copy link

rejanef commented Jan 31, 2023

Hello,

Is it possible to change the way the plugin gets the document type from a bibtex entry? For example, some publications are being classified as journal articles instead of conference paper as shown in the image below (this happens in many other cases). I would like to get the type from the field "type"

Thank you

image

@fabricebg
Copy link
Contributor

fabricebg commented Jan 31, 2023

With Bibtex, the document type is dictated by the prefix at the very beginning of the entry, @ARTICLE in your case, which corresponds to "An article from a journal or magazine." (ref) The type field you highlight should be used to specify the type of a Technical report only. (ref) I suggest that you rectify the Bibtex entries in your file before you start importing.

@rejanef
Copy link
Author

rejanef commented Feb 1, 2023

This suggestion turns out to be not very practical because I have a lot of publications (+1000). So, is there a way to filter the publications and display the tags in the publication listing using the field type instead of using the original type in the BibTeX format?

@fabricebg
Copy link
Contributor

So, is there a way to filter the publications and display the tags in the publication listing using the field type instead of using the original type in the BibTeX format?

Unfortunately, no.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants