Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

td:hasInstanceConfiguration used in JSON-LD context is not in the ontology #1988

Closed
aamedina opened this issue Mar 22, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1999
Closed

td:hasInstanceConfiguration used in JSON-LD context is not in the ontology #1988

aamedina opened this issue Mar 22, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1999
Assignees
@mahdanoura
Labels
Semantics Semantics-related issues

Comments

@aamedina
Copy link

aamedina commented Mar 22, 2024 •
edited

The JSON-LD context states:

"hasInstanceConfiguration": {
      "@id": "td:hasInstanceConfiguration",
      "@type": "@id"
    },

Source:

wot-thing-description/context/td-context.jsonld

Line 47 in d947efd

"@index": "hasInstanceConfiguration"

When I tried parsing the WebhookThing example (https://www.w3.org/TR/wot-thing-description11/#example-70), the generated RDF used this property (td:hasInstanceConfiguration) from the JSON-LD context, which could not be resolved in the actual ontology.

However, I found that td:hasConfigurationInstance is available (

wot-thing-description/ontology/td.ttl

Line 133 in d947efd

:hasConfigurationInstance rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ;
)

BTW: Thanks for your work on this spec!
@github-actions github-actions bot added the needs-triage Automatically added to new issues. TF should triage them with proper labels label Mar 22, 2024
@aamedina aamedina changed the title td:hasInstanceConfiguration used in JSON-LD context is not on the ontology td:hasInstanceConfiguration used in JSON-LD context is not in the ontology Mar 22, 2024
@egekorkan egekorkan added Semantics Semantics-related issues and removed needs-triage Automatically added to new issues. TF should triage them with proper labels labels Apr 3, 2024
@mahdanoura mahdanoura mentioned this issue Apr 5, 2024
Merged
mahdanoura added a commit to mahdanoura/wot-thing-description that referenced this issue Apr 18, 2024
@mahdanoura
errata modified for issue w3c#1988, term inconsistency among ontology…
369ff76 
… and context files
@mahdanoura mahdanoura mentioned this issue Apr 18, 2024
Merged
egekorkan added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 25, 2024
@egekorkan
Merge pull request #2001 from mahdanoura/errata
74cc95e 
errata modified for issue #1988, term inconsistency among ontology an…
egekorkan pushed a commit to mahdanoura/wot-thing-description that referenced this issue Apr 25, 2024
@mahdanoura @egekorkan
errata modified for issue w3c#1988, term inconsistency among ontology…
ee5a215 
… and context files
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mahdanoura mahdanoura

Labels
Semantics Semantics-related issues
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Term inconsistency among the ontology and context file mahdanoura/wot-thing-description
3 participants
@aamedina @mahdanoura @egekorkan