You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If I understand well (after reading some issues, discussions and PRs) the latter specification is the new reference for VC-JWT encoding. It states the following sentence in the JOSE Header and JWT Claims part:
The JWT Claim Names vc and vp MUST NOT be present.
Looking at Example 3 of the VC Data Model v2.0 specification, I noticed that the vc claim is used.
I imagine this is an outdated example ? If so, here are the parts of the specification that need to be updated:
Yes, we need to fix this. We finally updated the version of respec-vc to use the new code base, we need to update the vc-jose-cose portions of that code base now.
Manu Sporny: good news is we released a new version of respec-vc.
… but the new jose/cose stuff is not in there yet.
… it should be a copy/paste into respec-vc.
… or decentralgabe can send a PR there.
Gabe Cohen: it's on my list.
… and given the update to remove YAML from the jose/cose spec, it should be simpler to do now.
Manu Sporny: just to make sure we're aligned, what are you planning to implement?
… SD-JWT, JOSE, COSE, something else?
Gabe Cohen: I was going to do all 3, but not automatically render them.
… I'll put up a PR.
… I'd prefer to start by fixing what is currently labelled VC-JWT.
Manu Sporny: you can pick which tabs to show per example.
Brent Zundel: with that, we are out of time.
… great consensus building. we love our volunteers.
… bye for now.
Hi again 👋
While reading the Verifiable Credentials Data Model v2.0 specification and the Securing Verifiable Credentials using JOSE and COSE specification, I've noticed discrepancies about VC-JWT encoding.
If I understand well (after reading some issues, discussions and PRs) the latter specification is the new reference for VC-JWT encoding. It states the following sentence in the JOSE Header and JWT Claims part:
Looking at Example 3 of the VC Data Model v2.0 specification, I noticed that the
vc
claim is used.I imagine this is an outdated example ? If so, here are the parts of the specification that need to be updated:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: