Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How are the chance for adding an accidentalQuarterToneSharpZimmermann #264

Open
bwbohl opened this issue Oct 27, 2022 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #286
Open

How are the chance for adding an accidentalQuarterToneSharpZimmermann #264

bwbohl opened this issue Oct 27, 2022 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #286
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@bwbohl
Copy link

bwbohl commented Oct 27, 2022

I observed that there is a glyph range “Stein-Zimmermann accidentals” (24-EDO) (U+E280–U+E28F). In my work at the Zimmermann complete edition project, it has become obvious that this glyph range misses the Zimmermann-specific notations of the quarter and three-quarter sharps.

  • The quarter sharp is essentially a regular sharp missing the lower 'horizontal' line.
  • The three-quarter sharp is a combination of the quarter-tone sharp followed by a regular sharp

Zimmermann uses this notation in his handwriting and also the print publications followed his model.
How are the chances of adding these to the free codepoints in the block?

@dspreadbury dspreadbury self-assigned this Nov 5, 2023
@dspreadbury dspreadbury added this to the SMuFL 1.5 milestone Nov 5, 2023
@bwbohl
Copy link
Author

bwbohl commented Mar 26, 2024

@dspreadbury I'm delighted to see this has been added to the SMuFL 1.5 milestone!
There is yet another variant of the three-quarter sharp to be added from Zimmermann’s autographs: a normal sharp with a third 'horizontal' line.
If it helps, I'm also willing to file a pull request ;-)

@bwbohl bwbohl linked a pull request Mar 26, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants