ZWorkflowOptions errors if options are not in correct order

[carlosedp]

While migrating from 0.5 to 0.6, I gound that ZWorkflowOptions is positional.

If I setup as:

client.newWorkflowStub[EchoWorkflow](
                    ZWorkflowOptions
                        .withTaskQueue(TemporalQueues.echoQueue)
                        .withWorkflowId(workflowID)
                        .withWorkflowExecutionTimeout(60.seconds)
                        .withWorkflowRunTimeout(10.seconds)
                        .withRetryOptions(
                            ZRetryOptions.default
                                .withMaximumAttempts(3)
                                .withInitialInterval(300.millis)
                                .withBackoffCoefficient(1)
                        )
                )

I get the error:

[error] -- [E008] Not Found Error: /Users/cdepaula/repos/scala/zio-temporal-hello/webclient/src/WebClient.scala:26:25
[error] 25 |                    ZWorkflowOptions
[error] 26 |                        .withTaskQueue(TemporalQueues.echoQueue)
[error]    |                    ^
[error]    |value withTaskQueue is not a member of object zio.temporal.workflow.ZWorkflowOptions
[error] one error found
1 targets failed

But shuffling up the withWorkflowId, it works:

client.newWorkflowStub[EchoWorkflow](
                    ZWorkflowOptions
                        .withWorkflowId(workflowID)
                        .withTaskQueue(TemporalQueues.echoQueue)
                        .withWorkflowExecutionTimeout(60.seconds)
                        .withWorkflowRunTimeout(10.seconds)
                        .withRetryOptions(
                            ZRetryOptions.default
                                .withMaximumAttempts(3)
                                .withInitialInterval(300.millis)
                                .withBackoffCoefficient(1)
                        )
                )

I think the order shouldn't matter.

[vitaliihonta]

Hey @carlosedp, thanks for reaching out! I think it's easy to achieve by duplicating this "builder step".
I'll implement it once I have free time 😄