Offer a new way to resolve file conflict on copying

[jose1711]

Currently a user is presented with the following options:

• rename
• skip (all)
• append
• overwrite (all)

I would like to see another option: rename original file at the destination (i. e. make it possible to create a copy of the current file).

[xaizek]

rename original file at the destination

(i. e. make it possible to create a copy of the current file).

Doing the former doesn't automatically entail the latter. Cloning a file like that is a special case.

There is a TODO entry for the former for years now (added by me, never came up anywhere).

Mind that explicit cloning might be more convenient to do via :clone command, which is also bound to C key (the clone needs to be renamed afterwards).