Replies: 3 comments
-
I don't think I have an informed opinion. I know a lot of libraries don't like GPL 3.0, but seeing as this is an application, not a library, I'm not sure complaints apply. And I'm being nebulous because I don't actually remember the complaints :D. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm also not 100% certain that GPL-2.0-or-later would be a better choice. I just have a feeling that GPL-2.0-or-later would be more permissive license, in a good way. Yeah, WLA DX is not really a library, but it can be used in the same ~fashion as a library: included in other projects as tools, or build an app around it like I've done in https://github.com/vhelin/SameSameC which has WLA DX as a Git submodule; the compiler generates WLA DX asm and the linker "links" everything together and calls WLA to assemble (and link) the asm code. There would be no SameSameC without WLA DX. I could have just used compiled WLA DX binaries there, but maintaining them would mean more work... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Ok, if there are no objections, I'm changing the license to be GPL-2.0-or-later at the end of July 2022... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
As asked in #515 - any comments? I'm thinking we should switch to GPL-2.0-or-later
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions