Can we please have official support for putting everything in a src directory?

[scf4]

This feature has been requested for years (e.g., #4789).

We've had workarounds, but now with things like official TS support it's no longer possible because Next assumes so much of our project structure. E.g., we can run "next ./src" but it assumes our tsconfig.json should be under src, too.

Putting everything in a src dir is such a common project structure. It's used by CRA and just about every React starter kit.

Our components dir is on the same level as dist, .babelrc, tsconfig.json, node_modules, pages, next.config.js, static, etc. It's so disorganized!

All we would like is a srcDir option. Why is there so much opposition from the Next team on this?

[sakulstra]

Why is there so much opposite from the Next team on this

I'd guess because a lot of functionality and optimizations in next.js are build around having the pages inside the pages directory.

On a side note - i was upvoting the original issue and just removed my vote.

After using next.js for a while I learned to bend my mental model to see pages folder as routes api only (i guess routes would have been a better name, but no need to change it).
As soon as you want things like page in page modals https://reacttraining.com/react-router/web/example/modal-gallery with next having actual react component code in pages is no longer feasible and you might want to start a reexport pattern like described in the linked issue.

We currently use this structure in a rather big app and developers tend to like(or at least not hate) it.

pages
- index
- auth
-- login
- api
-- graphql
src
- frontend
-- pages
--- Home
--- auth
---- Login
- backend
-- gql
-- models

I'd love to see #7779 to land as we currently still rely on relative import paths.

[scf4]

I'd guess because a lot of functionality and optimizations in next.js are build around having the pages inside the pages directory.

I fully understand this, but allowing the directory to be ./src/pages instead of ./pages shouldn't affect any of these optimizations — the pages dir is still treated as a routes api.

[timneutkens]

Going to close this as this is not following the issue template nor is it an RFC. I'm really not sure why you completely ignored the issue template.

I replied here yesterday that we'll soon add support for src: #4315 (comment)

We'll post a RFC soon.

[timneutkens]

Posted #8451

[balazsorban44]

This issue has been automatically locked due to no recent activity. If you are running into a similar issue, please create a new issue with the steps to reproduce. Thank you.