Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using fuse-box instead of webpack? #1522

Closed
formula349 opened this issue Mar 27, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Using fuse-box instead of webpack? #1522

formula349 opened this issue Mar 27, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@formula349
Copy link

I love Next.js, and I have been testing it out for some time now. Reading the 2.0 release notes, it seems like developer experience is a priority (which it should be).

I ran across fuse-box a few months back and was really impressed how fast the browser would hot reload the page. I've never seen anything this fast! It was well under 100ms.

fuse-box has some other nice features, and it feels like it would pair really well with next.js. Does anyone have any experience with fuse-box?

https://github.com/fuse-box/fuse-box

@arunoda
Copy link
Contributor

arunoda commented Mar 27, 2017

Next.js is pretty much based on Webpack. Although fuse-box sounds so great, we hope there is a lot we can do to make webpack fast.

And it's the most adopted and we are not looking to replace it in the near future.

@arunoda arunoda closed this as completed Mar 27, 2017
@oliviertassinari
Copy link
Contributor

Fuse box looks promising. I hope it will incentivise Webpack to improve the rebuild time.

@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented May 10, 2018

This thread has been automatically locked because it has not had recent activity. Please open a new issue for related bugs and link to relevant comments in this thread.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 10, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants