Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion to avoid or circumvent huge deficits #86

Open
thiagocapuano opened this issue Mar 31, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Suggestion to avoid or circumvent huge deficits #86

thiagocapuano opened this issue Mar 31, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@thiagocapuano
Copy link

A very large deficit brings uncertainty and questioning from investors, even if it is corrected by the market fluctuation.
At the same time, I increased the market price point for NSBT liquidation and the delay to start liquidation it.

When the deficit reaches a certain percentage and at the same time there is a vacuum between the percentage of start of issue and the purchase orders of the NSBT by investors, the neutrino stake could stop paying the rewards in USDN and start the payment of the rewards in NSBT + the percentage established by the deficit, such a situation would provide the reduction of the deficit and the starting point of settlement would gradually decrease, thus allowing to be closer to the expected balance, reverting the payment to USDN again when the deficit enters 25% and eliminating the space between the percentage of purchase and existing orders.

@SERHYG
Copy link

SERHYG commented Apr 5, 2020

Hi there
look here: #85 (comment)
I have entered a very similar proposal.
I would like to read your opinion and how would you apply it to the contract?
best regards

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants