You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When using typeahead with a complex object it may be useful to choose in which fields search for matches. As for now complex objects typeahead requires the usage of [typeaheadOptionField] that is quite useless without having a chance to choose where to search.
Describe the solution you'd like
I'd like an input like [typeaheadSearchFields] that accepts one or more strings of the fields I want the typeahead to search between. The related values would be concatenated and the matchers should search inside that resulting string.
Describe alternatives you've considered
All solutions that I found out were way too much complicated for this. I think [typeaheadOptionField] is quite useless without this other feature.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When using typeahead with a complex object it may be useful to choose in which fields search for matches. As for now complex objects typeahead requires the usage of [typeaheadOptionField] that is quite useless without having a chance to choose where to search.
Describe the solution you'd like
I'd like an input like [typeaheadSearchFields] that accepts one or more strings of the fields I want the typeahead to search between. The related values would be concatenated and the matchers should search inside that resulting string.
Describe alternatives you've considered
All solutions that I found out were way too much complicated for this. I think [typeaheadOptionField] is quite useless without this other feature.
Additional context
Already proposed here: #2563
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: