Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Digital Video - reference the codec as an underlying vulnerability factor #30

Open
DigitalBedrock1 opened this issue Jul 3, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@DigitalBedrock1
Copy link

Digital video formats are listed (MOV, AVI, etc.). However, the video codec stream inside that format also has risk. For example, ProRes, found inside MOV files, is a proprietary codec owned by Apple. While preferred formats are not listed for digital video, there should be a reference to the video codec as an underlying vulnerability factor.

@dangormanjr
Copy link

What is the possibility of NARA acquiring proprietary technical specs for in-house use only, not to be shared with visiting researchers?

@lljohnston
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes, we maintain an in-house specification/standards library.

As to codecs, this is something we are aware of and we are considering updating the metrics to take codecs into consideration. We are also aware that it will greatly increase the complexity of the analysis of A/V formats so we're putting thought into the right approach.

@jyw321
Copy link

jyw321 commented Oct 13, 2020

One more issue I would like to raise is about the library of codecs held by different organizations/softwares.
For example, rendering a video into H.264, if we use Adobe Premiere, the resulting codec would be mp41/mp42. But if the video is rendered in FFmpeg, the codec would be isom/mp41.
There are still debates in the field about different libraries licensed to different organizations, and it is still nebulous that whether the different licensing affects the risk of the digital files.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants