Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clearer distinction between Public Access and archival holding migration suggestions #20

Closed
jackdos opened this issue Oct 31, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@jackdos
Copy link

jackdos commented Oct 31, 2019

In the digital audio section, the expressed preference of format is BWF or FLAC, with MP3 being listed as a Public Access format. In some of your format recommendations below the action is "Transform" to BWF or MP3. I think the implication here is that transformation should be to BWF for long term retention, or MP3 for Public Access. If my interpretation is correct, it might be useful to make a clearer distinction between the purposes of the recommendations; if not, then it would be useful to suggest some minimum quality standards for migrating to MP3 as the "archival" copy.

@lljohnston
Copy link
Collaborator

You're totally right about your assumption and the need to clarify the difference between the archival file and the public use file.

@lljohnston
Copy link
Collaborator

We'll continue to iterate through these to clarify which is a preservation option and which might be a public access option. In some cases, transformation to MP3 could be the only option based the tools that can open and transform the original format, so we'll make that clearer.

@eengland eengland closed this as completed May 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants