Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Get verified on Flathub ? #2778

Closed
erlefloch opened this issue Mar 28, 2024 · 12 comments
Closed

Get verified on Flathub ? #2778

erlefloch opened this issue Mar 28, 2024 · 12 comments

Comments

@erlefloch
Copy link

erlefloch commented Mar 28, 2024

Description

Get the flatpak version verified on Flathub, as it's already an official mean of distribution stated in the readme section "Automated or maintained builds".

Who's implementing?

the authors

The problem

On Flathub there is now a flag "Unverified" on the ungoogled-chromium page which suggests that the flatpak is unofficial.
However it seems to actually be an official mean of distribution stated in the readme section "Automated or maintained builds".
image

Possible solutions

Follow the indications on https://docs.flathub.org/docs/for-app-authors/verification

Alternatives

No response

Additional context

No response

@rany2
Copy link
Member

rany2 commented Mar 29, 2024

@Eloston I'll need you to login to https://flathub.org in order to verify the Flatpak. Apparently after you login using your GitHub account, you need to visit this page: https://flathub.org/apps/manage/com.github.Eloston.UngoogledChromium

@rany2
Copy link
Member

rany2 commented Mar 29, 2024

Unfortunately this Flatpak was made before the ungoogled-software organization was created and you can't just rename an app ID...

@rany2
Copy link
Member

rany2 commented Apr 5, 2024

We're working on it here: flathub/flathub#5098

It's blocked right now because I'm waiting for this to be merged: refi64/cobalt#7

@Sunspark-007
Copy link

Might be a good idea to post on the main github page that the flatpak has changed owners because in the discover store the update just keeps failing.. the other ungoogled-chromium exists with a manual search and it's possible to install both at the same time, but the app menu can only launch the original.. I will fix my local end, but other people might be running into the same issue.

@networkException
Copy link
Member

networkException commented May 4, 2024

whats "the main github page"?

@Sunspark-007
Copy link

The README.md file on https://github.com/ungoogled-software/ungoogled-chromium

@networkException
Copy link
Member

networkException commented May 4, 2024

I don't know what else to put there besides

Flatpak: Available in the Flathub repo a io.github.ungoogled_software.ungoogled_chromium

@Sunspark-007
Copy link

Just write that people need to uninstall the old version of ungoogled-chromium, make note of any settings or extensions they want to keep, and then start from scratch with the new one.

@rany2
Copy link
Member

rany2 commented May 4, 2024

This can be closed now.

@rany2
Copy link
Member

rany2 commented May 4, 2024

Just write that people need to uninstall the old version of ungoogled-chromium, make note of any settings or extensions they want to keep, and then start from scratch with the new one.

False, just run flatpak update and say "YES" to the EOL prompt.

https://github.com/flathub/com.github.Eloston.UngoogledChromium/?tab=readme-ov-file#urgent-please-read-this

@Sunspark-007
Copy link

That's good information, but I didn't see that on the Eloston page and I didn't open the terminal.. I was just wondering why the discover store kept saying there was an update available. When I ran warehouse, I did see the notification that it was EOL which in turn was also a surprise because it seemed so sudden. The EOL notice in warehouse doesn't say to go read, it just says that it's EOL.

@rany2
Copy link
Member

rany2 commented May 4, 2024

@Sunspark-007 There is a bug with KDE Discover: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485886

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants