QA Check Report - Consider changing the Full Report from a superset to a complementary set.

[ldbiz]

The report as stands works in two settings:

Core Report - Original spec to highlight potential legal scope and resource issues.
Full Report - Additional QA issues.

The Full Report includes the core report.

It may be more useful for curators to have them as separate result sets (rather than one included in the other); this would give the benefit of the existing setup with the added ability to easily distinguish between the two for work prioritising.

This is a design question for future discussions, and may need a non-trivial change. As it hasn't actually been requested, I'll assume low-priority.

Example (using a hypothetical 1000 row result set)::

Current format
Core Report:
300 Result Rows

Full Report
1000 rows: 300 of them comprising the core results, 700 additional quality issues.

Proposed format:
Core Report
As Above

Complementary Report
700 rows for the additional quality issues.