You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some of the constraint equations we have implemented are often in practice used with f-values with upper and lower bounds set in the IN.DAT. If we optimise with inequality constraints and remove the f-values we can not implement these user selected bounds.
For example in DEMO we often select
ixc = 9 * fdene
boundu(9) = 1.2
to allow for a solution with densities above the Greenwald limit but $f_{GW} < 1.2$. The only way to bound the LH fraction ($f_{LH} = P_{sep}/P_{LH}$ ) currently is to bound the f-vlaue flhthresh. For instance
Some of the constraint equations we have implemented are often in practice used with f-values with upper and lower bounds set in the IN.DAT. If we optimise with inequality constraints and remove the f-values we can not implement these user selected bounds.
For example in DEMO we often select
to allow for a solution with densities above the Greenwald limit but$f_{GW} < 1.2$ . The only way to bound the LH fraction ($f_{LH} = P_{sep}/P_{LH}$ ) currently is to bound the f-vlaue
flhthresh
. For instanceAgain for the ne0 > neped constraint
This functionality could be replaced by slightly modifying the constraint equations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: