Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Implement ucan: URI subscheme, remove as: and my: support #25

Open
cdata opened this issue Sep 23, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Implement ucan: URI subscheme, remove as: and my: support #25

cdata opened this issue Sep 23, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@cdata
Copy link
Member

cdata commented Sep 23, 2022 •
edited

Part of #11

https://github.com/ucan-wg/spec#42-own
@cdata cdata changed the title Implement own: URI subscheme, remove Implement own: URI subscheme, remove as: and my: support Sep 23, 2022
@cdata
Copy link
Member Author

cdata commented Sep 23, 2022

This maybe weighs on #10 , which maybe needs to have its scope updated.

@cdata cdata added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 23, 2022
@cdata cdata mentioned this issue Sep 26, 2022
Merged
@jsantell
Copy link
Contributor

As of 0.10.0, own is removed ucan-wg/spec#132

@jsantell jsantell mentioned this issue May 25, 2023
Closed
@jsantell
Copy link
Contributor

Continuing with this for 0.10.0, own has been removed from the spec, and the new ucan: fulfills a similar role. Additionally, the prf: scheme is no longer supported

@jsantell jsantell mentioned this issue Jun 23, 2023
Merged
@cdata cdata changed the title Implement own: URI subscheme, remove as: and my: support Implement ucan: URI subscheme, remove as: and my: support Jun 27, 2023
This was referenced Aug 17, 2023
Closed
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@cdata @jsantell