-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Automated QA: End-to-end tests #633
Comments
yarn test
/start |
Too many assigned issues, you have reached your max of 2 |
@whilefoo The time limit for this bounty is on Sun, 20 Aug 2023 16:25:51 UTC |
Do you have any updates @whilefoo? If you would like to release the bounty back to the DevPool, please comment |
@whilefoo - Releasing the bounty back to dev pool because the allocated duration already ended! |
/start |
Tips:
|
Do you have any updates @whilefoo? If you would like to release the bounty back to the DevPool, please comment |
@whilefoo - Releasing the bounty back to dev pool because the allocated duration already ended! |
@whilefoo The time limit for this bounty is on Sun, 03 Sep 2023 17:11:27 UTC |
@whilefoo - Releasing the bounty back to dev pool because the allocated duration already ended! |
@whilefoo The time limit for this bounty is on Thu, 07 Sep 2023 10:05:38 UTC |
The amount of open pull requests is getting out of hand and we believe that this is the best tool to handle them. |
Suggestion to the original spec: @pavlovcik Could we change the script name from #734 -- seems better that this PR has a |
Do you have any updates @whilefoo? If you would like to release the bounty back to the DevPool, please comment |
Do you have any updates @whilefoo? If you would like to release the bounty back to the DevPool, please comment |
Do you have any updates @whilefoo? If you would like to release the bounty back to the DevPool, please comment |
Do you have any updates @whilefoo? If you would like to release the bounty back to the DevPool, please comment |
yarn test
script.env
) that tests all the bot commands, and then checks the result.Originally posted by @web4er in #626 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: